Reseller Hosting, Shared Hosting, Dedicated Hosting by Vortech Inc.

Go Back   Reseller Hosting, Shared Hosting, Dedicated Hosting by Vortech Inc. > >> General Public > Chit Chat Public
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chit Chat Public Talk about any thing you want! This forum is public.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2005, 02:24 PM
Ram_Argid Ram_Argid is offline
Vortech Inc. Customer
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Reverse DNS and Email

I've tried searching through the forums to see how others are handling the junk folder/spam issue of reverse DNS. I found this thread and it seems to outline the general thoughts on this issue, but not in regard to email: http://forum.vortechhosting.com/showthread.php?t=5989

Is there a way to overcome the reverse DNS issue as it applies to email spam filters and the like? Is there a way to (for instance) use TXT records to overcome the issue (for those services that look at them anyway)?

I realize that ALL email IP's are shared and therefore reversing back to them is a moot point, however, there must be a way around the email getting nailed for spam/junk (even though it is a small percentile).
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:47 PM
Altair Altair is offline
Programmer
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
I'm not sure about this, but what I think you are saying is...

Right now if you setup mail.domain.com and then do a reverse on the IP address, it comes back with mail[server-number].hsphere.cc.

You want to know if you can show that mail is coming from mail.domain.com rather than hsphere.cc. Is that correct?

If that is the case, I am not sure. Have you contacted Vortech on this?
__________________
If you haven't the strength to impose your own terms upon life, you must accept the terms it offers you.

Last edited by Altair : 12-06-2005 at 02:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-06-2005, 02:51 PM
Ram_Argid Ram_Argid is offline
Vortech Inc. Customer
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
No. The first part is correct, the second part I'm pretty sure isn't possible since ALL ip's for email are shared.

What I want to know is if there is a solution for this. Such as using txt records as denoted here: http://www.openspf.org/

Any solution to this would be welcome however.

I was hoping to perhaps get both Vortech and others input on this all at once.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-07-2005, 02:09 AM
mresell's Avatar
mresell mresell is offline
ePerson
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: Around the \bin
I think that resellers here would like some info on spf. I have seen it stated that vt is using it. I don't think everyone is particularly clear on the ramifications of trying to use it with the forwarding etc....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-07-2005, 03:32 AM
Brangwyn Brangwyn is offline
T3CHN0 STUD
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: New Zealand (Wellington)
The mailservers here all have valid PTR/RDNS that is

http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=216.157.145.20

So I don't see any problem there, when someone goes to send mail to that server, it would answer as mail.hsphere.cc and has a valid RDNS entry for mail.hsphere.cc so there shouldn't be any issues with RDNS afaik.

SPF Records (doesn't HSphere have them built in now?) but yes, they are just plain TXT records, you can create a simple valid SPF record like "v=spf1 a mx ~all" which should be acceptable to any mailserver actually verifying SPF (not a heck of a lot of them seem to care about SPF anyway).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Vortech Inc. ©2005
Page generated in 0.53035 seconds with 18 queries
[Output: 51.99 Kb. compressed to 48.35 Kb. by saving 3.64 Kb. (6.99%)]