Reseller Hosting, Shared Hosting, Dedicated Hosting by Vortech Inc.

Go Back   Reseller Hosting, Shared Hosting, Dedicated Hosting by Vortech Inc. > >> General Public > Chit Chat Public
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chit Chat Public Talk about any thing you want! This forum is public.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-21-2003, 11:00 AM
watermelon's Avatar
watermelon watermelon is offline
Vortech Inc. Customer
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: Portland, OR
Question over limit pricing

Hi There.
I have a question about overage pricing.
If I have a customer who is subscribed to an account that has a limit of 100 Mb and he is using 110 Mb but my Reseller plan is still way below its usage limit (e.g. using 200 Mb out of 1500 Mb), will I still be charged the per Mb rate by Matrix for the 10 Mb overage that my customer has?

Thanks,
Paul
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-21-2003, 11:54 AM
landiserve
Guest
 
if are not over you won't be charged.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-21-2003, 12:10 PM
Vixen's Avatar
Vixen Vixen is offline
Twisted Administrator
Admin
 
Location: Orlando, FL
Send a message via ICQ to Vixen
Space is based on allocation NOT usage. Just to reiterate. Since we seem to be getting alot of people wondering why they were billed for overages.
__________________
~Vixen~





Team Warped MySpace



View Team Warped's Profile


**If you want something done right, get a woman to do it.**


All questions, comments, concerns, complaints, frustrations, irritations, aggravations, insinuations, allegations, accusations, contemplations, consternations, or input should be directed elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2003, 12:32 PM
watermelon's Avatar
watermelon watermelon is offline
Vortech Inc. Customer
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: Portland, OR
OK - thanks for your replies.

So if I have a hosting account that I'm just managing several of my client's domains in (i.e. they don't need CP access), it makes the most sense to allocate the very minimum (say 5 Mb) to that account and let it go over the limit, since there is no consequence to letting it go over the limit, and the allocation for my reseller account stays as low as possible. Right?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2003, 01:10 PM
jmbeach's Avatar
jmbeach jmbeach is offline
mistra know it all
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: San Diego
Quote:
Originally posted by watermelon
OK - thanks for your replies.

So if I have a hosting account that I'm just managing several of my client's domains in (i.e. they don't need CP access), it makes the most sense to allocate the very minimum (say 5 Mb) to that account and let it go over the limit, since there is no consequence to letting it go over the limit, and the allocation for my reseller account stays as low as possible. Right?


Actually, that's a really great way to go about it. I never really considered that.

What I do for clients that don't need CP access is just create one plan (if they're windows or unix clients) and add their domains all into that one CP - this way you also save on how many CP's you dole out - plus you only have to login to one to manage all those domains.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2003, 06:17 PM
Silverbug's Avatar
Silverbug Silverbug is offline
Custom Built Solutions
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: AK, New Zealand
Send a message via ICQ to Silverbug Send a message via MSN to Silverbug Send a message via Skype to Silverbug
Quote:
Originally posted by watermelon
So if I have a hosting account that I'm just managing several of my client's domains in (i.e. they don't need CP access), it makes the most sense to allocate the very minimum (say 5 Mb) to that account and let it go over the limit, since there is no consequence to letting it go over the limit, and the allocation for my reseller account stays as low as possible. Right?
damn why didnt i think of that (dont say anything) time to go change all my plans
__________________
Paul Foley
Sniper Systems Ltd

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-21-2003, 08:21 PM
Brangwyn Brangwyn is online now
T3CHN0 STUD
Vortech Inc. Customer
 
Location: New Zealand (Wellington)
I've been considering doing something very similar after a rather frustrating time with H-Sphere billing for overages that didn't even exist ! hehe kudos to Lindsey though for sorting most of that out
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2003, 10:07 PM
Vixen's Avatar
Vixen Vixen is offline
Twisted Administrator
Admin
 
Location: Orlando, FL
Send a message via ICQ to Vixen
Quote:
Originally posted by Brangwyn
kudos to Lindsey though for sorting most of that out


Better her than me. LoL I am the Modern Bill expert around here, as it was the only billing system we had for a looooooooooooong time. To me, it's simpler than Hsphere but to each their own. It's all about what you like.

I *DO* wish Modern Bill was as automated as Hsphere, in some respects (monthly rebills).
__________________
~Vixen~





Team Warped MySpace



View Team Warped's Profile


**If you want something done right, get a woman to do it.**


All questions, comments, concerns, complaints, frustrations, irritations, aggravations, insinuations, allegations, accusations, contemplations, consternations, or input should be directed elsewhere.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Confused with Pricing thdrought H-Sphere Pre-Sales 7 01-10-2004 05:20 AM
overage pricing sobocinski Chit Chat Public 9 10-25-2003 05:05 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin Version 3.5.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Vortech Inc. ©2005
Page generated in 0.64420 seconds with 17 queries
[Output: 76.70 Kb. compressed to 71.39 Kb. by saving 5.31 Kb. (6.93%)]